Runner Systems Explained: Cold Runner vs Hot Runner in Injection Moulding
- 6 days ago
- 8 min read
Updated: 5 days ago
In Indian manufacturing, where tooling budgets, material costs, and annual production volumes vary significantly, selecting the right injection mould runner system (cold runner vs hot runner) directly impacts long-term profitability.
For product designers, procurement teams, and startup founders, this choice directly impacts:
Tooling cost
Per-part cost
Material wastage
Cycle time
Overall project ROI
If you're investing in production tooling, understanding how to choose between cold runner vs hot runner in injection moulding systems is critical.
Let’s break it down clearly.
Table of Contents
What Is a Runner System?
In injection moulding, molten plastic flows from the machine nozzle into the mould cavity through a network called the runner system.
The runner system consists of:
Sprue (main channel from machine to mould)
Runners (distribution channels)
Gates (entry point into the part)
The design of the injection mould runner system plays a critical role in material flow balance, cycle time, and overall mould performance — especially in multi-cavity moulds used for high-volume production.
The difference between cold and hot runner systems lies in how the plastic inside these channels is handled after each shot.
Cold Runner System
A cold runner system allows the plastic in the runners to cool and solidify along with the part.
After ejection, you get:
The finished part
A solidified runner (scrap or regrind material)
How It Works
Molten plastic enters the mould.
It fills the runners and cavities.
The entire system cools.
The part and runner are ejected together.
Runner is separated and either scrapped or reground.
Advantages | Disadvantages |
|
|
When Should You Use Cold Runner?
Low-volume production
Prototype tools
Price-sensitive tooling projects
Engineering validation batches
Startups testing product-market fit
For many Indian manufacturers and startups, cold runner tooling is the practical starting point.
This is especially true for MSMEs, product startups, and companies launching new SKUs in India where initial volumes are uncertain and capital expenditure must be carefully controlled.
If you want to understand the cost of injection moulding in India — and how to make smarter decisions for long-term ROI — explore these related articles: Injection Moulding Cost in India: Tooling, Part & Hidden Costs
Hot Runner System
A hot runner system keeps the plastic inside the runner channels heated and molten throughout the process.
This means:
No solidified runner
Only finished parts are ejected
How It Works
The heated manifold and nozzle maintain molten plastic.
Plastic flows directly into each cavity.
Only parts solidify.
No runner scrap is produced.
The runner system remains heated between cycles — hence the name.
Advantages | Disadvantages |
|
|
When Should You Use Hot Runner?
Some products achieve desired finish only with the application of hot runner system
When the application requires minimal gate marks
High-volume production
Expensive engineering polymers
Multi-cavity moulds
Fully automated production lines
Long product life cycles
If your annual volume crosses a certain threshold, hot runner systems quickly become more economical. This is common in export-oriented manufacturing units in India producing lakhs of parts annually for automotive, consumer goods, and electrical industries.
Cold Runner vs Hot Runner in Injection Moulding: Quick Comparison
Factor | Cold Runner | Hot Runner |
Tooling Cost | Lower | Higher |
Per-Part Cost | Higher | Lower (at scale) |
Material Waste | Yes | No |
Cycle Time | Slower | Faster |
Maintenance | Easier | More Complex |
Best For | Low Volume | High Volume,Expensive engineered plastics |
Cost Perspective (Indian Manufacturing Context)
In the Indian manufacturing landscape, where tooling budgets often dictate procurement, it is vital to look beyond initial capital expenditure. Given that raw material costs fluctuate and production planning is tied to quarterly demand cycles, the long-term economics of cold runner vs hot runner systems in injection moulding can make or break a project's profitability.
Choosing a system based solely on upfront tooling cost frequently leads to inflated operational costs over the product lifecycle.
For example:
Cold runner mould: Lower initial investment
Higher cost per part throughout the entire product life-cycle
A hot runner mould approximately adds:
₹40,000–₹50,000 per drop (pricing can vary, and may be higher depending on the specific brand of nozzle chosen).
₹80,000–₹1,00,000 for manifold (up to 4 drops)
₹50,000–₹80,000 additional accommodation cost
But if you’re producing lakhs or millions of parts annually, material savings and cycle time reduction can justify the extra investment quickly.
The break-even depends on:
Part weight
Polymer cost
Annual volume
Number of cavities
A proper engineering and financial analysis is essential before finalising the runner system.
Cold Runner vs Hot Runner for Multi-Cavity Moulds
In multi-cavity moulds — typically 2, 4, or up to 8 cavities — runner balance becomes critical for consistent part quality.
In higher cavity tools, even small variations in flow can lead to:
Uneven filling
Weight variation between cavities
Dimensional inconsistency
Hot runner systems can provide better flow control and cavity filling consistency, especially in 4 or 8 cavity production tools. However, the tooling cost increases with the number of drops required.
For moderate-volume applications, a well-designed cold runner system can still perform efficiently when properly balanced.
At Gan Tools, we evaluate runner balance carefully for multi-cavity moulds (up to 8 cavities) to ensure consistent production quality and cost efficiency.
Break Even Analysis
The biggest factor to decide if you need a hot runner system is volume.
Note: This simplified method does not account for long-term tool maintenance, downtime risk, or hot runner component replacement costs.
What you need to know
Tool cost with hot runner system
Tool cost without hot runner system
Part Cost with hot runner system
Part Cost without hot runner system
Expected product lifecycle production volume -> production volume
From this we calculate :
Extra tool cost = Tool cost with hot runner system - Tool cost without hot runner system
Savings in part cost = Part Cost with hot runner system - Part Cost without hot runner system
Break-even volume = Extra tool cost /Savings in part cost
If Production Volume < Break-even Volume → Cold Runner is Economical
If Production Volume > Break-even Volume → Hot Runner is Economical
Total Savings = Savings in part cost * ( production volume - Break-even volume )
Example :
Tool cost with hot runner system = ₹6,60,000
Tool cost without hot runner system = ₹4,00,000
Part Cost with hot runner system = ₹ 24
Part Cost without hot runner system = ₹ 28
Extra tool cost = ₹6,60,000 - ₹4,00,000 = ₹2,60,000
Savings in part cost = ₹28 - ₹24 = ₹4
Break-even volume = ₹2,60,000 / ₹4 = 65,000 Nos
Case 1:
Production volume = 30,000
Savings = ₹4 * (30,000-65,000) = - ₹1,40,000
Out of the ₹ 2,60,000 extra cost ₹ 1,40,000 is not recovered
When production volume is below break-even volume it is a loss to have a hot runner system.
Case 2
Production volume = 1,00,000
Savings = ₹4 * (1,00,000-65,000) = ₹1,40,000
Case 3
Production volume = 4,60,000
Savings = ₹4 *(4,60,000-65,000) =₹4 * 3,95,000 = ₹ 15,80,000
Many companies realise too late that choosing the wrong runner system locks them into avoidable per-part costs throughout the product lifecycle
So, Which One Should You Choose?
There is no universal answer.
Cold runner is better when:
You want lower upfront risk
Volumes are uncertain
You’re still iterating the design
Hot runner is better when:
Production volume is stable
Material cost is high
You want maximum efficiency
Better surface finish or gate aesthetics are required
The right decision depends on your production strategy, not just tooling cost.
At Gan Tools and Components we conduct a complete engineering and financial analysis before starting tooling to make sure you have the highest possible ROI.
FAQ
Is hot runner better than cold runner?
It depends on production volume and material cost. For low volumes, cold runner is more economical. For high volumes, hot runner reduces part cost.
How much does a hot runner system cost in India?
₹40,000–₹50,000 per drop
₹80,000–₹1,00,000 for manifold (up to 4 drops)
₹50,000–₹80,000 additional accommodation cost
Can regrind be used in hot runner moulds?
Usually limited. Hot runner nozzles are sensitive to contamination. To learn about the factors considered in material selection and some common injection moulding materials and their common uses checkout our blog about injection moulding materials
Injection Moulding Materials Explained: ABS, PP, Nylon, PC & More
How much does injection moulding typically cost in India
Read our detailed guide on tooling investment, part pricing, and cost optimisation strategies for manufacturing in India.
Injection Moulding Cost in India: Tooling, Part & Hidden Costs
I need to get a small batch of products in India. Is low-volume injection moulding worth it?
Read our detailed guide on low volume injection moulding in India which explains the type of low cost injection moulding options , economics , payment systems and when not to chose injection moulding Low Volume Injection Moulding in India for Startups
Does hot runner reduce cycle time in injection moulding?
Yes. Since the runner does not need to cool and solidify, cycle time is reduced. This increases output per shift and improves machine utilisation.
Can a cold runner mould be converted into a hot runner mould?
In certain cases, a cold runner mould can be upgraded to a hot runner system. If you anticipate making this change in the future, informing your mould maker during the initial design stage will make the conversion smoother and more cost-effective.
Final Thoughts
Choosing between cold and hot runner systems is a technical decision and a business decision.
For businesses evaluating injection mould tooling cost in India, runner system selection should always be analysed from a lifecycle profitability perspective rather than just initial capital investment.
A good moulding partner will:
Analyse projected volumes
Evaluate material costs
Calculate break-even points
Design tooling aligned with your growth plan
If you're planning an injection moulding project and unsure which runner system makes sense, it’s worth discussing your product and its production volume before committing to tooling.
Because in manufacturing, the smartest decision is the one that balances cost, scalability, and long-term ROI.
Not Sure Which Runner System Is Right for Your Product?
At Gan Tools, we help customers evaluate whether a cold runner or hot runner system makes financial sense based on lifecycle volume, material cost and an engineering standpoint.
Share your:
Part weight
Annual production volume
Material type
Expected product lifecycle
Our engineering team will help you evaluate whether a cold runner or hot runner system makes financial and technical sense.
Website : www.gantools.com
Email : development@gantools.com
RFQ : Google form for RFQ
Your ideas stay yours. By uploading your files, you are simply giving us permission to review them. We will not use your designs for any other purpose, nor will we share them with anyone outside our team without your written consent. You keep 100% of the ownership of your work.
Comments